|
TRANSLATED FROM
FRENCH SITE BY ANNAESSE |
|
Please note: This page is not part of the official
police files. It is an analysis of Anomalies in the
Creche files, that can be seen here
LINK |
|
|
Sign-in/check-in
Warner/Creche lists |
|
The McCann case: anomalies in the
case file |
Since a small part of the case file - the DVD version was made
accessible to the public, a great deal of ink has flowed. We
note that it is necessary to be cautious as to its contents. In
fact, it is only 17% of the complete case file and certain
details are only of interest in relation to the complete file
and not taken out of their context.
You probably know that our team, at the association, is
comprised mainly of professionals from the field of police work.
As such, we have analysed the case file and from the first
pages, we have identified a few anomalies. Thus, the registers
from the Kids Club appeared to be incomplete. Certain gaps have
not been explained.
Thus we note that on May 1st 2007, Madeleine McCann's name is on
the Kids Club register. She arrived at 9.30am, dropped off by
Gerry. According to the register, Gerry spent the morning
playing tennis. He went back to fetch Madeleine at 12.20pm.
Where things seem stranger to us is in the entries for the
afternoon. Gerry drops Madeleine off at the Kids Club at 2.30pm
and he spends his afternoon, again according to the register,
playing tennis and at the swimming pool. Oddly, no one went back
to fetch Madeleine in the evening! No signature for the evening
of May 1st 2007. Why? Why did no one sign the register that
evening?
Various explanations are possible.
It could be imagined that the parents arrived late to pick up
Madeleine and that they didn't take the time to sign the
register. In that case, why isn't that made clear in the case
file? Why is there no mention of this possible lateness? And
above all, why were they late? Right in the middle of an
investigation into the mysterious disappearance of a little four
year-old girl, these details are important. But the anomalies
continue the following day.
According to the register for May 2nd 2007, the day before
Madeleine's disappearance, Kate dropped Maddie off at the Kids
Club at 9.20am. Madeleine was picked up at 12.30pm but it's not
Kate or Gerry's signature on the register. Someone else has
signed the register in the space for parents. The signature of
Cat nanny, in other words, CATRIONA BAKER is found there.
Here too, you could imagine various explanations. The parents
arrived late (once again?) and in a hurry (why?), they didn't
sign the register. You could think that they forgot, for the
second time, to sign the register. You could imagine that
Catriona had finished her shift and as the parents had not yet
come to fetch Maddie, Catriona signed the register then took
Madeleine to her parents. You could imagine lots of things. But
no explanation is provided in the case file. Catriona didn't
mention it in her interview, the parents neither. But this kind
of detail raises questions that need to be resolved. Too many
unanswered questions, too many whys, too many gaps, not enough
explanation.
These explanations could go in both directions. Thus, the
investigators must wonder if Maddie didn't disappear sooner than
May 3rd? If she was indeed present present at the Kids Club on
the afternoon of May 1st? Why didn't anyone sign the register?
Was she actually present at the Kids Club on the morning of May
2nd? Why did Catriona sign in the space for parents? Why does
Kate's signature on the register for May 2nd seem different from
Kate's other signatures? Where were the parents if someone else
signed for them?
Certainly, these anomalies may only be trivial details, but
these details could equally be significant, even fundamental to
the investigation. Don't forget we are talking about the
disappearance of a little four year-old girl. We cannot allow
ourselves to leave these questions unanswered.
These anomalies, which are the first of a long series, were
communicate to whom they may concern. And it is in referring to
the article on SOS Madeleine of November 19th, we discover that
a hand-writing report would be necessary. This confirms our
suspicions and implicitly confirms certain rumours mentioning
forged pieces of writing, forged signatures....manipulated
documents...signatures added several days after the date
indicated...etc.
If this report, that SOS Madeleine speaks of, confirms our our
suspicions (and the rumours) these details which we have
officially revealed, are then clearly less "trivial" !!!! |
|
TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON LINE PLEASE
CONSIDER |
|
|
|
|
