|
COMPUTER
OPERATOR 07 MAY 07 |
|
357 to
359 Witness statement of Joao Manuel Marreiros Viana
2007.05.07 |
|
02-Processos Volume II Pages 357 - 359 |
|
TRANSLATIONS BY INES |
| 02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_357 |
 |
| 02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_358 |
 |
| 02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_359 |
 |
Joao
Manuel
Marreiros
Viana
Date/Time:
2007/05/07
12H20
Computer
Operator
Portuguese
Concerning
the
issue
of
the
process
said:
.
That
four
about
20
years
has
worked
in
the
tourist
resort
known
as
the
Ocean
Club,
situated
at
44
Rua
Direita,
Praia
da
Luz,
(Luz,
Lagos),
having
exercised
his
function
of
computer
operator,
and
his
normal
office
location
is
in
the
reception
of
said
establishment
(at
the
address
indicated
earlier);
.
relative
to
the
investigative
facts
the
witness
clarifies
that
on
May
04,
2007
(Friday),
at
around
09H20,
he
was
already
at
his
work
location,
and
was
informed
by
his
colleagues
that
during
the
previous
night
(03
May
2007),
at
approximately
21H30,
a
child
of
the
feminine
sex,
three
years
of
age,
of
British
nationality,
who
has
lodged
with
her
parents
and
siblings
in
an
apartment
?water
side
garden?,
block
5,
apartment
A in
the
Ocean
Club
report,
had
gone
missing
from
the
interior
of
the
same;
.
Questions,
the
deponent
states
that
he
did
not
know
the
missing
child
not
the
rest
of
the
family
of
the
same,
and
only
saw
Madeleine
(her
name
he
got
from
his
colleagues)
and
her
parents
and
siblings,
after
the
disappearance,
in
media
outlets,
who
divulged
the
situation;
.
Questioned,
the
deponent
clarifies
that
on
the
day
of
the
disappearance
of
Madeleine,
he
completed
a
normal
day,
that
around
09H20
arrived
to
his
office,
having
interrupted
for
lunch
between
13H00
and
14H30,
and
returned
there
where
he
stayed
until
18H30.
Following,
he
left
for
home,
where
he
stayed
until
the
next
day;
.
Questioning
the
deponent,
he
clarifies
that
his
home,
situated
on
the
Municipal
Road
(direction
of
Espiche-Luz),
House
100
Name,
in
Calicos
da
Luz
(Lagos),
distance
from
the
office
around
1500m;
.
That
after
having
got
home,
there
he
stayed
until
the
next
day,
with
a
friend,
conforming
to
what
was
explained
earlier;
.
Relative
to
the
facts
of
the
investigation
in
the
present
inquiry,
the
deponent
only
knows
that
which
he
heard
from
media
outlets,
and
also
in
conversations
with
his
work
colleagues;
. As
with
the
above,
he
has
no
useful
element
regarding
the
facts
of
the
investigations,
nothing
more
to
add
with
the
exception
of
what
has
already
being
written,
referring
that,
conforming
to
what
he
was
previously
told,
said
child
accompanied
her
parents
on
holidays
in
the
resort
where
he
works,
together
with
her
two
siblings
of
two
years
of
age;
.
That
he
has
no
knowledge
of
any
type
of
situation
that
is
considered
suspect
that
could
he
directly,
or
indirectly,
related
with
the
facts
of
the
investigation
in
the
present
case;
.
And
nothing
further
was
said.
Having
read
the
statement,
he
finds
it
in
conformity
and
signs
it;
.
The
document
is
duly
signed
by
me,
C.
Domingos,
an
Inspector
with
this
Policia
Judiciaria.
|
|
|
TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON LINE PLEASE
CONSIDER |
|
|
|
|
|
