OCEAN
CLUB MAINTENANCE |
264 to 265 Witness Statement of Nuno Filipe Guerreiro da
Concericao 2007.05.06 |
02-Processos, Volume II Pages 264 to
265 |
02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_264 |
|
02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_265 |
|
Witness Testimony of Nuno Filipe
Guerreiro Da Conceicao
Date of Diligence: 2007.05.06
Time: 20H50
Locale: Praia da Luz
Executing Officer: Pedro Florindo,
Inspector
Profession: Maintenance Technician
Place of work: Ocean Club Resort,
Praia da Luz, Lagos
That he comes to the process as a
witness and states:
- That he is a functionary of the
Ocean Club for about eight years and
exercises his functions in the
maintenance area. He is responsible
for fulfilling maintenance requests
on all the buildings related to the
resort.
- That he works daily from 09H00 to
18H00, with weekly breaks on
Wednesday and Thursday. Besides his
routine hours, he also may be called
at any time to carry out
maintenance/repairs.
- That the majority of people who
stay at the resort are foreigners,
mainly English.
- Questioned, he states that, last
Thursday, he was off duty but was
called by the reception and went to
the resort around 020H30 to open a
door that had problems. After
completing the work for which he was
called, which took him about 15
minutes, he left for his residence,
and was again contacted, at around
22H15 to ask him if there were
torch/flash lights that could be
used to help look for a child that
had gone missing. The deponent
responded that there weren't any and
was not called again that night.
- When he arrived the next morning,
around 07H10, he encountered many
people and GNR/police close to block
5 along with some foreigners, who,
at the time, he associated with the
disappearance of the child he had
heard about the night before. He
headed toward his place of work and
that morning carried out his
functions which included the
cleaning of the pools next to the
Tapas restaurant. He did not notice
anything out of the ordinary.
- During the day he learnt more via
his colleagues of the story of the
missing child.
- Questioned, he states that he
never came across a circumstance
that made him pay particular
attention to this family, not with
the children or before the
disappearance.
- Questioned, he states that he does
not remember having seen Madeleine's
face before her photograph was
released in the media and which he
helped distribute to the apartments
after her disappearance.
- He states that the break-ins to
the apartments are common,
especially
for burglary purposes, and that some
are the result of clients leaving
their doors open.
- Questioned, he states that
according to what he remembers, he
did not observe any abnormal
movements by any individual that
would indicate s/he was preparing to
commit a criminal act.
- And nothing more was said. He
reads and finds it in conformity. |
|
TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON LINE
PLEASE CONSIDER |
|
|
|